KUALA LUMPUR: Jul 4, 2008 By SHAHANAAZ HABIB
PKR is "absolutely surprised" that Abdul Razak Baginda's private investigator P. Balasubramaniam had retracted his first statutory declaration which they insist he made voluntarily.
PKR vice-president R. Sivarasa said the retraction was something serious and called for an independent investigation and a Royal Commission of Inquiry.
He believed Balasubramaniam had been under pressure by "interested parties" to withdraw the first statutory declaration that had been released on Thursday where he alleged that Deputy Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak had a sexual relationship with Mongolian translator Altantuya Shaariibuu, among other things.
Balasubramaniam had also said in his first statutory declaration, that before Razak was arrested for abetting in Altantuya's murder, he had showed him an SMS purportedly sent by Najib telling him to be cool and that everything would be resolved because he (Najib) was meeting with the Inspector-General of Police at 11am that day.
"Other than his statutory declaration, Bala (Balasubramaniam) spoke openly about it during the press conference (at the PKR headquarters on Thursday). You can tell from his demeanour that he was speaking voluntarily.
"Then he changes overnight. This is very unusual. There are two statutory declarations and the judge in the Altantuya trial needs to decide which one is the truth," said Sivarasa who is a lawyer by profession.
He said it was obvious that someone or "interested parties" got Balasubramaniam to change his statement, adding that there was a pattern of manipulation in this.
"This has a bearing in criminal justice system," he said.
Barely 24 hours after his first statutory declaration, Balasubramaniam made a second statutory declaration on Friday stating that his first statutory declaration was made under duress and as such he wished to retract its entire contents.
Sivarasa said he "is absolutely certain" that Balasubramaniam had made the first statutory declaration voluntarily.
"His lawyer Americk (Sidhu) will support that," he said, adding that it was not PKR that engaged the lawyer for Balasubramaniam.
Sivarasa said that when Balasubramaniam first approached him about the Altantuya murder case, he advised the private investigator to get a lawyer and write down the details independently.
"I only saw the statutory declaration after it was completed," he said.
At Thursday's press conference organised by PKR de facto leader Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim where Balasubramaniam released his first statutory declaration, he was present with his lawyer Americk.
On Friday however, for his second statutory declaration, Balasubramaniam engaged a different lawyer, Arulampalam Mariam Pillai.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
Ripleys movie on “Believe it or Not ” showed many crime stories in the word. Ripleys not to miss out the C4 blasted Altantuya where her soul is now still searching her murderers and master culprits day and night. Maybe her unrest soul will read both declaration letters for clues to find out the TRUTH. Then she will suck their blood out on her cruel culprit killers who worst than animals.
Now Ripleys and the CSI Miami experts are interested to solve this Altantuya cool blooded C4 murder case that also involved several high profile politicians and special military force. Many Malaysians are also keen to solve this interesting C4 complex puzzle of a high risk crime story and to know the TRUTH on who is lying? and who are the real killers ? Let Ripleys starts to solve some clues based on the Statutory Declaration (SD) letters issued out by a King Blogger and a private eye P. Balasubramaniam recently.
1. Yes, future Ketuanan first lady of coming PM said she is innocent and she does not want to sue Raja Petra on his SD letter. - Why is she so afraid to sue for defamation against Raja Petra ?
2. Her future coming darling PM also doesn’t want to sue P. Bala on his SD1 letter. - Why no balls to sue an Indian HERO rather than a weak poor mother of 2 kids?
3. Subsequently, panic P.Bala became an overnite “2 headed-Snake” for issuing his SD2 letter to deny SD1 was issued under duress. Why he is under duress from……any reasons unknown?
Suprised !!! Any clues here? - Can you help Ripleys to solve the questions raised above ?
Let Ripleys asked some doubtful questions with some crime experts and some legal experts on their opinions on this high profile crime in Malaysia.
Read carefully the findings below on the Altantuya unrest soul to tell you :-
CSI investigators from a Peaceful Hill is still sleeping soundly on their jobs simply because who dares to investigate and fire their TOP GUNs.
Legal Eagle is also day dreaming in their jobs too because who dares to prosecute their TOP EAGLEs.
Ripleys final conclusion in his findings noted below:-
“NO HUMAN, NO GHOST, DEATH PERSON NEVERS LIE,
BELIEVE THEM OR NOT, so WHO IS LYING and WHO is MASTERMIND KILLER” ?
GOD knows better . May Altantuya Soul rest in peace forever. Blast her Killers go to HELL !
Post a Comment